Political Intangible Assets 2021…third in a series

Michael D. Moberly, Principal, Founder, kpstrat

I am confident there are studies which may not be conveyed here, which could shed more particularized light on this central question…

  • are there relevant and comparable correlations between acquiring, utilizing, and exploiting,
    • business things intangible by business leaders, management team members, and investors, etc., and
    • political things intangible by those who hold elected public office (local, state, federal)?

Intangible assets are non-physical – non-tangible. They are broadly categorized and materialize in various forms, contexts, and applications of intellectual, structural, and relationship capital, e.g., the seemingly endless ways either can – could be applied, collaborated, and integrated in a product and/or service with a presumably favorable outcome.

More specifically, the perspective I endeavor to present for reader consideration here (as a business intangible asset strategist and risk specialist) is a sense some elected public office holders perhaps (whether they express operational familiarity with the ‘intangible assets’ specifics or not) exhibit…

  • responsivity to when, where (circumstances), and how to apply and exploit particular – intangible assets (ideologically, politically) to advance or sustain a position tangential to a public office which they have been elected.

Arguably, political things intangibles present day, surface and materialize @ at will, and @ keystroke speeds 24/7/365, e.g.,

  • some elected public office holders convey – exhibit (seemingly) a sense of (political – ideological) obligation,
    • presumed to be obligatorily necessary for sustaining an elected public office, i.e., responses and positioning @ keystroke speeds, and
    • presumed (near term) advantages for doing so, coupled with  
    • presumed demand and premium for their opinion(s) to be framed, delivered, and received in constituents – followers inboxes @ keystroke speeds in-the-midst of unraveling and evolving circumstance and/or event.

Arguably too, those who may bereceptiveand inclined (independently, collectively, or collaboratively) to pursue, become aligned (politically, ideologically) and perhaps endeavor to leverage same, i.e., a particular-event, circumstance, situation, behavior, utterance, with (political, ideological) commentary appears to be an irreversible norm with little constituent – follower tolerance for variance.

For some elected public office holders, publicly conveying influenced perspectives and/or interpretations @ ‘keystroke speeds’ via social media platforms…

  • with previously unimaginable reach, wherein
  • ‘constituent’ is being variously substituted for ‘follower’ may not consistently or necessarily be a good thing.

As alluringly expedient and variously addictive as these circumstances may be, will same consistently be a good thing either.

Respectfully, some readers may construe this perspective represents a too-subjective leap. I invite review of a range of posts @ Business Intangible Asset Blog.


Popular Posts

Divi Real Estate Agent | Luxury Properties


1234 Divi St. #1000, San Francisco, CA 94220

Phone Number

(255) 352-6258

Business Hours

24/ 7 / 365

Sign up to get latest news & Listings:

Do you need some help?

Vivamus eleifend mattis eu faucibus at felis eget. Tincidunt at ut etiam turpis consectetur euismod. Ullamcorper aenean sem sceleris que sed vel facilisi netus ut. Pharetra vitae sed ut sed sit pharetra sed. Sit sollicitudin potenti laoreet auctor non nunc. Quam viverra commodo vel adipiscing tortor ultricies.
Copyright © 2024 | Privacy Policy
Divi – Real Estate Agent