• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Business Intangible Asset Blog, Michael D. Moberly

Business Intangible Asset Blog where attention span, business realities, and solutions converge.

  • What’s Important To Know About Michael D. Moberly
  • What are Intangible Assets
  • Services – kpstrat
  • Contact Mr. Moberly
  • Books and Professional Papers
  • Videos – Media Appearances
  • Cart
  • Leverage This Blog’s Content for Marketing – Engaging Clients!
  • Register
  • Activate
  • Intangible Asset Curriculum for Business

Protect Intangible Assets Only Throughout Their Contributory Value and Functionality Cycles’…

December 20, 2012 Leave a Comment

Michael D. Moberly   December 20, 2012

By now, readers know that it is an irreversible economic fact (business reality) that steadily rising percentages (65+%) of most company’s value, sources of revenue, and ‘building blocks’ for growth, profitability, and sustainability globally evolve directly from intangible assets!

Ensuring the necessary control, use, ownership and value of those assets is sustained, but only for their respective contributory value and functionality cycle is a significant departure from  the conventional practice of lifetime safeguards, but is, in my view, a more practical, efficient, and probably a more prudent strategy given the extraordinary pace and speed assigned to business processes, transactions, and the accommodation of consumer preferences and demands.

I am the first to admit there will be exceptions. However, my primary rationale for safeguarding key intangibles for periods commensurate with their contributory value and functionality cycle is, in large part, due to the assets’ increasingly integral, but, at the same time, often short-lived role and/or relevance to a particular business process or transaction.  In other words, intellectual, structural, and relationship capital can translate into very lucrative ‘magic’ when generated and applied to accommodate specific business needs, i.e., activities, processes, or transactions. But, in today’s globally competitive, nanosecond, and predatorial business (transaction) environments, most any assets contributory value can erode, be undermined, its competitive advantages existinguished, or simply be overtaken by improvements in very quick order.

Central to this perspective is the the necessity to incorporate continuous monitoring of intangible assets’ contributory value, particularly the intellectual, structural, and relationship capital which the assets are premised.

But, companies are essentially on their own to find the requisite services and expertise to not just understand intangible assets and their respective contributory values, but identify, unravel, safeguard, preserve, and monitor their stability, fragility, sustainability, defensibility, i.e., contributory value. Too, such services and expertise are rapidly becoming fiduciary responsibilities which fall exclusively to management teams, c-suites, and boards to articulate and execute as a foundation to gain and sustain asset value and competitive advantages efficiently, effectively, and consistently.

More specifically, the actual and contributory value of many, if not most intangible assets fluctuates, sometimes in cyclic fashion in accordance with an assets’ contribution and/or functionality to a particular project, initiative, business unit, transaction, or a company as a whole.

A perhaps crude, but relevant characterization of an assets life, value, and/or functionality cycle is akin to what a doctor once told me about the need for a particular prescription medicine, i.e., ‘you will know when you don’t need it anymore when you start forgetting to take it and realize you’re feeling fine without it’.

Too, the cyclic aspect to intangible assets’ (contributory) value, renders most conventional, snap-shots-in-time or one-size-fits-all (asset) valuation techniques less relevant and certainly less useful, because among other things, they…

do not factor materialized risks – threats to assets that can literally diminish their contributory value to zero almost instantaneously, and

provide little, if any, strategic (post transaction) context to certain intangible asset’s contributory value, in light of the consistent presence of asset risks and threats.

I can say with a high degree of confidence that once an (intangible) asset is compromised, infringed, misappropriated, or undermined, etc., its contributory value to a company or to a specific initiative can begin to unravel and hemorrhage rapidly, globally, and in many instances, irrevocably.

For me, this makes it all-the-more-prudent to monitor intangible assets life, functionality, and contributory value cycles! The point in time in which assets’ contributory features no longer carry the value they once did, i.e., deliver competitive advantages, sources of revenue, etc., it’s logical to assume there is less need to devote time and costly resources to preserving – safeguarding their proprietary status and/or value. This suggests those resources and that time should be devoted elsewhere, perhaps to newly developed and more valuable intangible assets!

Comments regarding my blog posts are encouraged and respected. Should any reader elect to utilize all or a portion of this post, attribution is expected and always appreciated. While visiting my blog readers are encouraged to browse other topics (posts) which may be relevant to their circumstance. And, I always welcome your inquiry at 314-440-3593.

Related Posts

  • Safeguarding Intangible Assets….But, Only For Their Life, Value, and Functionality Cycles!

    Safeguard intangible assets, but only for their respective life, value, and functionality cycles

  • Valuing Intangible Assets By Distinguishing Their Contributory Value

    Valuing intangible assets' contributory value.

  • Intangible Asset's Contributory Value

    The ‘contributory value’ methodology for IA's, is not quantitative in the conventional sense, i.e., no…

Categories: Intangible asset protection, Safeguarding - Mitigating Risks to IA Tags: Cycle of contributory value of intangible assets., Life cycle of intangible assets., Protecting intangible assets, Safeguarding intangible assets

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Blog Topics

  • IA Strategist and Risk Specialist
  • Safeguarding – Mitigating Risks to IA
  • IA Operational Familiarity Training for C-Suites and Management Teams
  • IA Value Propositions
  • Corporate and University Research Regarding IA
  • Law and Professional Services Firms Incorporating IA Client Services
  • Intellectual Property Enforcements and Holder Rights
  • Vietnam Combat
  • Intangible Asset Pre-Post Transaction Due Diligence

Subscribe via Email

Sign up to receive posts in your inbox
  • LinkedIn

Copyright ©2019 · KPSTRAT