• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Business Intangible Asset Blog, Michael D. Moberly

Business Intangible Asset Blog where attention span, business realities, and solutions converge.

  • About Mr. Moberly
  • Intangible Assets
  • Business Services
    • Business Training Curriculum
    • Professional Service Firm Marketing
    • Media Appearances
  • Shop
    • Cart
  • Blog
  • Contact Mr. Moberly

Intangible Asset Protections Are More Reactive Than Proactive!

July 9, 2008 Leave a Comment

Michael D. Moberly     July 9, 2008

There are numerous challenges and vulnerabilities to effectively safeguarding intangible assets…many of which arise from consequences to…https://kpstrat.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=5955

1. Significant voids which are routinely left insofar as…safeguards being applicable to data-information embedded in intellectual, structural, and relationship capital (intangible) assets. 

2. Large percentages of intangible asset safeguard initiatives…remain-based on theft – threat – scenarios rather than value dilution — competitive advantage undermining  scenarios…

3. The persistent adverse affects of globally predatorial competitor-business intelligence…information brokering, and data mining operations which are routinely omitted from information asset protection – value preservation equations…

4. Computer/IT security remains largely ‘one dimensional’…that is, it is primarily geared toward protecting data in stored states and/or during its transmission. 

5. Characterizing computer/IT security and information asset safeguards as…being synonymous, constitutes a serious miscalculation and misunderstanding about the content, format, value and most of all, vulnerability of intangible assets, ala intellectual and structural capital, particularly.

6. Legal mechanisms to enforce (safeguard) the economic side of…innovation and competitive advantage which the rightful holders – owners could reasonably expect from commercialization, exploitation, licensing initiatives and/or as intellectual property, are reactive, not proactive. 

     a. That is, they apply after losses, compromises, infringements, and/or               counterfeiting has occurred, assuming of course, it becomes known in a         timely manner!

Michael D. Moberly m.moberly@kpstrat,com St. Louis ‘Business Intangible Asset Blog’ since May 2006, 600+ published posts, where one’s attention span, business intangible asset challenges, and solutions converge!

Related Posts

  • The Difference Between Information Security and Information Asset Protection...

    'If I find a hole in my company's proprietary information fence, the job of information…

  • Company Value and Intangible Assets

    With intangible assets, it may not always be a case of ‘use’em or lose’em’, but…

  • Knowing The Value Of IP and Intangible Assets Helps Protect and Sustain Them!

    Information asset protection is not solely about recognizing and (subjectively) assessing risks and threats anymore,…

Categories: Uncategorized Tags: Add new tag, Rapidly accelerating interactions between intangibles a, Rapidly accelerating interactions between intangibles.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Blog Posts Archive

Blog Categories

  • Business Reputation Risk & Mitigation
  • Global Intangibles
  • Intangible Assets & Business
  • Intangible Valuation & Monetization
  • Safeguarding Intangible Assets & IP
  • Uncategorized
  • LinkedIn

Copyright ©2022 · KPSTRAT

Copyright © 2022 · Genesis Sample on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in